Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Common ground and cultural blender


I'VE HEARD neighborhood activists many times talk about their community work as a search for "common ground." Recently, I read an essay which takes that idea one step further, suggesting that community-building requires not only seeking, but also "cultivating" common ground.

Gardening is a wonderful metaphor for working together. In a garden, there is a kind of equality among participants. And there is a great sense of collaboration when all are planting and weeding together.

That collaboration reaches its peak at harvest. That's the time when gardeners share their produce, trading tomatoes and jalapenos, cantaloupe and kohlrabi. You might think of this trading as a giant cultural blender.

Gardens are just one place where this blender is whirring. If you look closely, you can find this find the mixing and remixing going on all over the place.

In Minneapolis, I lived next to a Middle Eastern restaurant which specialized in gyros. But the restaurant also offered bratwurst. Down the street a Chinese restaurant proudly displayed a sign reading: Se Habla Espanol.

The recent emergence of Day of the Dead celebrations around the Midwest offers a very great example of this cultural blending. The event itself is a blend of influences which have been mixing for centuries. The festival has been a tradition in Mexico and parts of the southwest US for years. Now, it's also celebrated in cities all over the US, including Minneapolis and Iowa City.

One part of the festival is building ofrendas, small memorial altars which pay tribute to those who have died. In the past, these ofrendas have usually been tributes to family members. But in Minneapolis, I saw a public display of ofrendas which included not only family members, but also shrines to Tupac, Martin Luther King and Princess Diana.

Iowa City's Day of the Dead celebration shows another way this cultural blending is at work. In that city, it is a very multicultural group which has shaped Day of the Dead into a major celebration each November.

There is a liveliness in the mixing. New traditions are shaped by this blender.

But there are times where there is strong resistance to this blending. Columbus Day festivals are one example. In a number of communities, these have become defiant tributes to a past that never was.

Many colleges and universities have had a hard time responding to this diversity. They have been quite willing to allow this cultural blender to operate around the edges, in such events as Diversity Day and Black History Month commemorations.

But have been less willing to allow the blender to broaden and strengthen the range of voices within academic departments. The best example of this has been the ongoing struggle to add African-American, Chicano and Native American voices to university departments. Women's voices, too, are often left out.

This is not a new problem, of course. Jane Addams wrote about this a century ago. She said universities have too often disconnected themselves from the real world outside the academy.

Hull House, the settlement she and others founded in 1889, was in part a response to this disconnection. Then, as now, many voices were excluded from the universities and museums. One response of Addams was to invite a broad range of people to speak and teach at Hull House. It was an early example of college extension classes. Another example: Major museums excluded the art and culture of many immigrant groups. So Hull House opened a museum to give those artists a place.

These and other Hull House initiatives are great examples of cultivating common ground and encouraging the work of the cultural blender. They are also models we can adapt for our time.

6 Comments:

At 5:38 PM, February 19, 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In chapter 6 of “Advocacy Practice” it talks about negotiation and persuasion for advocacy. Cultural blenders are happening now and have been happening for quite some time and for these blenders to even get started, some may need to negotiate or persuade. In order to get things started or even get ideas brought into action, negotiation may be the key. It is not about making threats or getting angry, it’s about reasoning with people to provide better futures for everyone. Common ground can more easily be met if people are willing to participate; however, this is not always the case, which is why negotiation through advocacy is needed.
-Lisa Assid

 
At 2:09 PM, February 20, 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

When we are trying to make changes, we have to give and take. Its not just one or the other... its a effort on everyones part. We have to all work together that is when change can be made. If we are only going to accept what we think is right, no changes will be made. For other to come along and make those changes with you, they have to have imput and feel part of the process... or nothing will happen.
Jessica K

 
At 11:55 PM, February 20, 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chapter 6 talks about how to negotiate and persuade people. Both of which are important. Not everyone is going to think the same or have the same outlook on everything. We need to negotiate or come to a compromise is some instances. In others situations someone with a little more knowledge on a topic may be able to persuade someone to take thier point of view. But to be persuasive you must be believable.

 
At 9:08 PM, February 21, 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everything we do in this world not only requires us to give a little, but also to take. The chapter we read deals with such an idea. In order to create all of these cultural blenders that we so desperately need in our society, we all must be willing to negotiate and also be able to persuade. Without these two important variables change is highly unlikely. I however realize this is a far harder idea to make real than it seems. This is another one of those things that takes a little bit of everyone and a lot of patience.

-Leslie Stusiak

 
At 12:21 PM, February 23, 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As many have posted before, Chapter six talks about negotiation and persuasion in advocacy. When I first read the title of this post I struggled to understand what the cultural blender had to do with persuasion or negotiation. I soon realized that because we live in a country that allows us to share our culture with others, we have found common ground in others traditions. Negotiation is simply taking the best from the situation and putting it in action, taking ideas from a substandard situation to create a program that fills a need not being met. Of course negotiation alone would be little without persuasion, people aren't going to cooperate unless the idea is truly benefitting all, and is respectful to all involved.

 
At 3:15 PM, February 26, 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chapter six discusses effective ways to persuade and negogiate with others. Everyone needs these abilities in order to make a change in society. We need to compromise as well and listen to others. When we open our minds it is then that we can begin to cultivate change in a positive way. Jane Addams plowed the way with the Hull House and she lead by example that with a lot of persuasion and some negostiation you can make a change in the world around you. I think to be good at what we do, we can learn from those who have pioneered the way for us. We need to recognize the needs we have in our own communities and work from the inside out to unite the community and make it a better place for everyone to live. A lot of what we do is advocating for change and it is then and only then that we make the most difference. We give a voice to the issue and then it will be taken seriously and hopefully in effect be solved.
-Angie Bares

 

Post a Comment

<< Home